G oog le Buell 1125R Forum | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » 1125R Superbike Board » Archives 001 » Archive through June 25, 2008 » High octane? better mpg and better throttle response « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Adoogie3
Posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 11:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I put some 110 octane in her and it smoothed her out alot.Ran better and I noticed that my estimate mpg went up right away.usually at 32 34 it went to 36 Ive never seen it go that high.Thats with me getting on it to.Is 110 bad to use in this beast.It has lead additives.They sell a 100 version with no lead too .At 12.3 to 1 ratio on the motor you would think it would help?Any others use high octane?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xb9
Posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 11:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Smoother her out for now. That will change. The lead will kill the O2 sensors fairly quickly.

Should only use unleaded. The combustion chamber is designed to burn 91 Octane or better (in the manual).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Andrewisu
Posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 11:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Here in Iowa it can be difficult for me to find a high octane fuel in small towns. If I can't find regular 91 octane I have the option of regular 87 or 89 with %10 ethanol. Which would be better? I know gas mileage will decrease with ethanol but is the extra octane worth it?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slypiranna
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 12:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Lowest octane that can be controllable within the combustion cycle will yield more power and better mileage than that of a higher octane rating.

There are, however, many variables that play into this equation...far off the scope here to fully digest.

With that said, your best bet is to stay with pump hi octane fuel...as listed in your owners manual.

And if you did manage to fill your tank with true leaded fuel, plan on a trip to the dealership for O2 sensors in the near future...they hate that stuff.

Plan on paying for them too as I doubt this thread will be a warranty issue.

Good luck
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

No_rice
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 10:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

hey andrew, i usually run 89 if i have to. but then i dont usually fill it up and try to find some better the next stop.

although in the spring and fall i dont worry so much. the hotter it gets and the harder you ride it the more you need the octane to help prevent detonation.

otherwise i have found a few places around here that run 93.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kravfighter
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 11:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I run the 89 when its cooler out, and 92 when its hot, no rhyme or reason, I just do it that way
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cutty72
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 04:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

91/92 all the time unless I can't get it. never put in less than 89, and it didn't like that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bdutro
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 05:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

With only a 0.10-0.15 per gallon difference between midgrade and premium, it was only ~8% back when fuel was cheap. Now that we're all in the $4.00/gallon boat together. ($4.32 in nor-Cal today) You're looking at barely 3% increase in cost to run factory spec fuel.

Has anyone ordered a barrel of VP fuel to try out? I would guess that the energy/volume and additive packages are the reason for the economy boost, not the octane.
(Does the 1125's ECU contain a knock sensor or spark retard function?)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Doerman
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 05:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

91 Octane, always.
Yesterday I filled her up. I was on reserve and the total on the pump was $23.75. Now, I think that's pretty special!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eddie
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 08:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

If you want to use a fuel additive try Lucus fuel additive.. it is not an octane boost and does not contain lead. It will not effect the sensor and will help with millage and performance. It cost between 12 to 15 bucks for a 32oz bottle. You only need 1/2 an ounce per tank.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick914
Posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 08:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Does anybody know the retard and advance timing threshold in the factory tuning program. It got me thinking of what the highest octane you could run with a 12.3:1 motor and if you could deck the heads some and raise the comp ratio for racing and get a few extra ponies. Just a thought out loud.
Rick
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slypiranna
Posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 08:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This link should answer many questions...

}
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slypiranna
Posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 08:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

www.osbornauto.com/racing/dragster.htm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slypiranna
Posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 08:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

While the above link is a little different than what we are dealing with concerning a modern 4 valve aluminum headed rotax...the basics should prove useful.

Modern 4 valve combustion chambers can tolerate 13:1 on pump 93 if the bore to stroke ratio, among many other variables...are married correctly.

5 valve heads by comparision...yamahas of the past, require major ignition lead for proper combustion...and therefor exhibit negative torque loses by comparison...at many load points...that is why they are now gone.

2 and 3 valvers have their place but herein, they are not useful for comparison.

This is all relative to a naturally aspirated engine...above atmosphere and or nos and or alternate fuels...is a whole different topic with many branches!

This is literally, scratching the surface of factual engine design/octane required per CR...there simple is too many variables to take into consideration.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick914
Posted on Saturday, June 14, 2008 - 01:19 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The reason I asked is I have Sunoco GT250 140oct for my VW Turbo drag, and was going to throw some in but I didn't know if it would be able to take full advantage of it.

My curiosity got the better of me today, I was on reserve and filled it up with the 104. Throttle response if much better has alittle more take off through the gears too. I got to 155 today for the 1st time and didnt know it, till i got ready to exit the highway =P

I did have trouble restaring it after riding hard for about 45min. Let it sit outside BestBuy for about 20mins.

All in all, it runs better, I have 3 drums that I bought at $6.5gal, so I might just blend for those fun weekends. Not really worth the extra $$$ for everyday though.

would still like some info on the ECU system and it's parameters if anybody has a site they know of.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration